FILTER SEARCH

Share Navigant

RSS Share It

Customize your search below

You can select the filters you wish to use below and/or conduct a keyword search in the box above.

Search Results

close X

James G. Zack

Jim Zack, Navigant
Office:
Los Angeles, CA
Phone:
+1.949.660.8209
Contact:
E-mail
vCard

Jim Zack is Executive Director of Navigant's Construction Forum™.  The Forum strives to be the construction industry’s premier resource for thought leadership and best practices on avoidance and resolution of construction project disputes globally.

Jim is a recognized and well published expert in mitigation, analysis and resolution, or defense of construction disputes. He is a nationally known author, speaker and trainer concerning the management, mitigation and resolution of construction claims and disputes.

Jim was formerly the Executive Director, Corporate Claims Management for Fluor Corporation. He possesses almost 40 years of deep industry experience in construction management and dispute resolution services. Jim has been involved in more than 5,000 claims, both public and private, and has been designated as an expert witness in mediation, arbitration and litigation.

Articles by James Zack

Constructive Acceleration - A Global Tour

This paper examines constructive acceleration in various legal jurisdictions, both common law and civil law, around the world to determine whether a contractor is able to use this type of claim to recover damages.

 White Paper
Practical Problems With Pricing Delay Using Eichleay

Navigant's Jim Zack discusses the practical problems with the Eichleay Formula in pricing delay claims.

 White Paper
Practical Problems Pricing Delay Using Eichleay

James Zack and David Halligan examine the traditional Eichleay Formula from the viewpoints of the project owner, contractor and accounting perspectives to identify the problems and offer some recommendations on how to alleviate the problems each can face.

 Article
Time Extension Requests – A Checklist

This white paper identifies the tests that have been set forth by the Federal Courts to justify an excusable or compensable time extension and how these rules are applied.

 White Paper
The Basics of Constructive Acceleration

Read how constructive acceleration claims are determined in various legal jurisdictions around the world to determine whether a contractor is able to use this type of claim to recover damages internationally.

 Article
The New Boards of Contract Appeals: Are They Still Predictable?

This study explores the shift in rulings in the 3 years since the consolidation of the various Boards of Contract Appeals.

 Research
Board of Contract Appeals or Court of Federal Claims: What Type of Claim Do You Have?

Navigant's report compares and contrasts 2,172 decisions of the Boards of Contract Appeals and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims relative to the outcome of construction disputes.

 Research
ON DEMAND: Construction Litigation - Recent Developments in Schedule Delay Analysis

James Zack, Executive Director, Navigant Construction Forum™, and Andrew Ness, with Jones Day summarize the major points of the AACE International published Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 – Forensic Schedule Analysis and addresses how attorneys can effectively utilize it in complex construction litigation.

 Webcast
Construction Scheduling Games Revisited

This paper authored by Jim Zack, Stephen Pitaniello and Amanda Jo Amadon, identifies 19 common schedule games played on construction projects and offers suggested defenses to help prevent and detect schedule gamesmanship.

 White Paper
Ten Mistakes Owners Make That Cause Disputes

After nearly four decades as a contracting officer James G. Zack, Jr. has concluded that employers routinely make a number of mistakes on projects that actually cause disputes.

 Article
Concurrent Delay

Jim Zack and Emily Federico explore the issue of how concurrent delay is commonly used by contractors to defend against liquidated damages when a project is completed late, and how owners can employ defenses to overcome these allegations.

 White Paper
Proving and Pricing Subcontractor Delay Claims

James Zack and Thomas Peters examine some issues concerning subcontractor delay claims, such as: Do subcontractors have the same rights and remedies as the prime contractor? Are they held to the same standards? What are their legal rights? Do owners owe time extensions for subcontractor delays? Are prime contractors at risk when they “pass through” a subcontractor’s delay claim to an owner?

 White Paper
Delay Analysis on Non-CPM Scheduled Projects

Navigant’s Jim Zack and Steve Collins provide recommendations for performing schedule delay analysis on projects using non-CPM scheduling techniques.

 White Paper
New Boards of Contract Appeals

This report provides statistical analysis of Board decisions in an effort to provide food for thought for legal counsel facing the typical client question, "Now that the Contracting Officer has denied some or all of my claim, what are my options? What do you recommend and why?"

 Research
Board of Contract Appeals or Federal Court of Claims: The Contractor’s Irrevocable Choice

It has been generally accepted that the Boards have more specialized knowledge and familiarity with construction issues and disputes than the CFC. Many attorneys have expressed the opinion that issues such as schedule delay, constructive changes, differing site conditions, constructive suspensions of work, and the like are decided more predictably in the Board forum. While some attorneys have commented that disputes before the Boards are less expensive and faster, others cite the Board’s tendency to grant more discovery requests and their failure to enforce trial calendars. The Navigant Construction Forum™ set out to test this opinion.

 Research
“Hope Is Not an Effective Risk Mitigation Technique”

Read the Navigant Construction Forum’s™ latest research perspectives that includes findings from its survey of senior Navigant construction consultants frequently engaged to perform risk identification, analysis and mitigation on major projects globally.

 Research
Pricing Contractor Delay Costs

This paper discusses eight methods of calculating extended field office overhead costs – offering commentary on the strong and weak points of each and offers a recommendation on how project owners can resolve this dilemma in advance of delays, thus making the issue less contentious should a contractor encounter an owner-caused delay.

 White Paper
New Study: Rigorous Risk Mitigation Offers Stronger Profitability and Productivity to Construction Firms, But Most Only Assess Risk (Press Release)

Navigant partnered with Pepper Hamilton to sponsor McGraw Hill study on mitigation of construction risk.

 News

Education

  • BA, Assumption College, Worcester, MA
  • MPA, University of South Carolina

Licenses

  • CCM
  • AACEI
  • PMP

Industry Specialization

  • Construction

Functional Expertise

  • Construction Schedule Analysis
  • Damages Analysis
  • Litigation Support
  • Expert Testimony